[Gc] gcc_support.c & WeakPointers
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:12:42 -0600 (CST)
Now I understand why the WeakPointer functions wrap the pointer in a
GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC object. And I should still use the
GC_call_with_alloc_lock function to get the pointer value of the
I just tried a version of the WeakPointers with the code for Descriptors
removed. It seems to be working. Since I don't any any finalizers, this
should be ok?
Thanks a lot for the help.
- Lee Faris
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> You should almost certainly not be using gcc_support.c. I just removed it
> from the distribution to avoid further confusion. It was there to support
> an gcc extension which was never fully released. I included it for a while
> in the hope that someone might resurrect it or be able to recycle pieces of it,
> and then forgot about it.
> I haven't looked at the weak pointer class in gcc_support.c recently.
> You may be able to resurrect it. If so, it might make sense to extract it
> and put it back in the distribution. If you need simple weak pointers,
> and don't depend on the precise interaction with finalizers,
> GC_general_register_disappearing_link together with a pointer that's either
> disguised (HIDE_POINTER or in preferably a GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC object) allows
> you to do that fairly easily.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> > Behalf Of Lee Faris
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:00 AM
> > To: email@example.com
> > Subject: [Gc] gcc_support.c
> > I am not able to use gcc_support.c as I get an undefined reference to
> > __default_new_handler. I can not find any mention of
> > __default_new_handler anywhere else. It sounds like
> > something that would be
> > defined in the stdc++ library (but apparently is not). Or am
> > I suppose to
> > set this value to something myself?
> > I get this error on both gcc 2.96 on linux 2.4.9 and in
> > VS.net 2003. Also,
> > in VS.net I get an undefined reference to __new_handler as
> > well. And a
> > related question, is gcc_support.c ok to use with visual
> > studio even though
> > it's called gcc_support.c? I am assuming so since it implements the
> > weakpointer class.
> > Thank you for any help with this.
> > - Lee Faris
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gc mailing list
> > Gc@linux.hpl.hp.com
> > http://linux.hpl.hp.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gc
> Gc mailing list