[Gc] Difference between version 6.3 and latest which is 6.4
Hans.Boehm at hp.com
Wed Jun 22 09:26:40 PDT 2005
It's a configurable option. But I think it's on by default in my source
distributions. I didn't check other distributions.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 mental at rydia.net wrote:
> Quoting "Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at hp.com>:
> > If you're sure it contains no pointers, I would probably use
> > GC_malloc_atomic_uncollectable, though the system malloc is
> > not a bad choice either.
> Isn't GC_malloc_atomic_uncollectable only available in special
> builds of libgc?
More information about the Gc