[Gc] Difference between version 6.3 and latest which is 6.4
ben.hutchings at businesswebsoftware.com
Thu Jun 23 11:23:34 PDT 2005
Emmanuel Stapf [ES] wrote:
> So I was using `malloc' for some C structures that actually had some references to
> objects I wanted to maintain alive. So my bad. I removed those occurences to use
> `GC_malloc' instead.
> It did go further, but it still fails. It is collecting a piece of memory that is
> directly referenced in the per thread data of a thread. Could it be that the gc
> does not know about those per thread data location?
Correct. The GC generally doesn't see thread-local storage. See the
thread "Registering TLS as roots" in the archive at
More information about the Gc