[Gc] SMALL_CONFIG a bad idea? (Was: Understanding why GC'ing
increases to the double in time?)
Martin Egholm Nielsen
martin at egholm-nielsen.dk
Tue Apr 4 06:46:56 PDT 2006
I know this thread is dead (thanks!), but my mind keeps returning to
your comment below, wondering about its meaning:
> The only things I noticed where:
> 1) You seem to be running with a block size of 1K instead of the normal
> 4K. That's probably good. But if that's a consequence of the collector
> having been configured with SMALL_CONFIG, it might be worth revisiting.
> (It looks like that's not the case, but ...)
As I read it, it almost seems like a bad idea running with SMALL_CONFIG?
More information about the Gc