[Gc] Re: SMALL_CONFIG a bad idea? (Was: Understanding why GC'ing
increases to the double in time?)
Martin Egholm Nielsen
martin at egholm-nielsen.dk
Wed Apr 12 01:48:10 PDT 2006
Boehm, Hans wrote:
> SMALL_CONFIG was really designed for very small configurations, e.g. 1
> or 2 MB heaps. And it tries to save space at the expense of speed. It
> looks like it's clearly suboptimal in your configuration, and probably
> for any use with gcj.
That sounds right! Thanks for clarifying - now this information is
persisted for other curious soles...
>>Well, I see there is a noticable speed difference running
>>with SMALL_CONFIG - it's about 20% slower configured this way.
More information about the Gc