[Gc] nobody out there has experienced with USE_MUNMAP?
aph at redhat.com
Fri May 12 11:51:30 PDT 2006
Glauco Masotti writes:
> Hello. I understand that you gurus (:-) are interested in other
> details of the software...
> but nobody out there has experienced the same heap growth problems
> that I described in my previous post?
> (Too bad that the graphs of memory management cannot be shared).
> As I said, in my case, the USE_MUNMAP option produces a much better
> behavior in memory management.
Better behaviour in what way? I can imagine that USE_MUNMAP results
in a somewhat reduced used of virtual address space, but not much
else. Do you actually see a reduction in the use of real memory? Does
More information about the Gc