Re: [Gc] Patches resubmission
ivmai at mail.ru
Fri Jun 5 00:19:05 PDT 2009
"Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at hp.com> wrote:
> Thank you. Committed.
> I'm not sure about the %p in WARN calls, since the corresponding argument is not a pointer anymore at
> that point. That may eventually start generating warnings? I checked in the whole patch, but I'm not sure those few bits were an improvement.
Not clear. Is "start" no longer a pointer in your copy of gc for this fragment:
"GC_gww_read_dirty unexpectedly failed at %p: "
"Falling back to marking all pages dirty\n", start);
More information about the Gc