Re: [Gc] getters and setters in misc.c
ivmai at mail.ru
Thu Jun 11 22:34:32 PDT 2009
"Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at hp.com> wrote:
> I think I would rather see separate getters and setters everywhere, and avoid the special arguments completely. This is probably an API change in a few cases already, but I think it's better to do this now than later. We should probably add error checks for what used tobe the special values.
> I'd love to see a patch that either did this, or cleaned up this part of the API in some other way. I don't believe such a patch is currently pending.
> Thanks in advance to anyone with the time to do this.
Ok. As most of these ones are introduced by myself lately, I'll do.
I'll split them (adding assertions for that special values) and add the missing getters/setter for the public R/W vars.
More information about the Gc