Re: [Gc] Win64 GCC support
ivmai at mail.ru
Mon Jun 22 07:45:04 PDT 2009
NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail.com> wrote:
> Petter Urkedal <urkedal at nbi.dk> wrote:
> > The policy question is rather whether to use AC_DEFINE or to place the
> > macro definition directly into header files under an
> > architecture-dependent conditional.
> Can you guys agree to the bikeshed's color quickly? Any way will
> work, and will be forwards-maintainable. Who's the guy that has to
> rubber stamp this?
> I'm not trying to sound impatient. It's just that this is backing up
> a lot of changes in other projects. We still need to get all of
> upstream boehm merged down into the GCC tree. I provided a two-line
> fix that will work with any recent autoconf (you won't be able to use
> 2.53 anymore, but then again, I doubt you can do that anyway what with
> your AC_INIT line and many other macros). That's one solution, and
> there are several more. I personally don't care how it's done, I just
> need it done.
Could you submit us a patch (fixing your problems in any way you like) which doesn't touch .c/h files?
More information about the Gc