ivmai at mail.ru
Sat Jun 27 11:26:34 PDT 2009
Hans Boehm <Hans.Boehm at hp.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> I believe that:
> - It was originally intended that adjacent free blocks cannot both be
> - It does not actually hold at the moment.
> - Performance would be improved if we made it hold again.
> - The existing code should work fine with assertions turned off. The
> collector doesn't rely on this property for correctness.
> I will try to generate a patch.
OK. Now I understand the situation. Thanks.
What's about my other latest patches (diff100_cvs, diff101_cvs, diff102_cvs) [Jun 13 and 20]? Any question?
More information about the Gc