Re: [Gc]: Maintainers attention: libatomic_ops
ivmai at mail.ru
Thu Oct 1 00:37:06 PDT 2009
Petter Urkedal <urkedal at nbi.dk> wrote:
> On 2009-10-01, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Am 30.09.2009, 19:32 Uhr, schrieb Petter Urkedal <urkedal at nbi.dk>:
> > > On 2009-09-29, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> > >> It looks like we're using automake 1.9.6 and autoconf 2.59?
> > >
> > > I believe that's the latest versions which are widely available.
> > Not at all. Current versions are automake 1.10.2 and autoconf 2.64. I
> > checked FreeBSD: automake 1.10.2 and autoconf 2.62; Ubuntu Hardy (the
> > early 2008 long-term support release) already has the releases suggested
> > below, current openSUSE has 1.10.1 and autoconf 2.63; Fedora 11 has
> > autoconf 2.63 and automake 1.11.
I've installed newest autoconf and automake. Now, autoreconf -vif (after deleting libtool.m4) fails with:
configure.ac:397: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_ENABLE_SHARED
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.ac:471: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> Do they not ship older versions of Automake? RHEL 4 and 5 ships
> Automake 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, and 1.9. Ubuntu 8.10 (yes, thats old) and
> Gentoo has a similar collections but include 1.10. My statement was
> about the intersection of versions across current distributions, but my
> samples are of course limited. OTOH, for Autoconf there may not be a
> greatest common version.
More information about the Gc