[Gc] Re: Problems with GC_size_map

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 2 10:08:55 PST 2010

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo at gnu.org> wrote:

> If bignums are stored in “atomic” memory regions, how could they lead to
> pointer misidentification?

My concern is not that the marking of the bignums is imprecise, but rather
that the marking of the environment (C stack, interpreter stack, etc) is
causing the set of blacklisted regions to grow and thus makes it more
difficult to reclaim those bignums: the effort in the garbage collection
process is larger. I use bignums precisely because they are atomic and thus
what is measured is just the pressure on the garbage collector due to the
environment, not the newly created objects. On a 64-bits systems the address
space is large and I presume this helps in garbage collection: most pointers
that are found in the stack are recognized as outside the region of memory
that the garbage collector handles.

The code is pretty simple and is exhibited below (Common Lisp). The three
timings below follow more or less the expected proportionality in a 64-bit
operating system, but are a factor 4 larger using the same processor in
32-bit mode. It is not just the instruction set: in the 32-bit case
statistical profiling reveals 80% time is spent in the mark phase of the
garbage collector, while in the 64-bit case the numbers dropped down

I have now managed to implement four marking strategies
- Everything is allocated either with GC_MALLOC or GC_MALLOC_ATOMIC
depending on the existence of pointers.
- Use of bitmaps and GC_malloc_explicitely_typed()
- Use of custom mark procedure by scanning field by field
- Use of custom mark procedure with globally stored bitmap
and they all give more or less the same timings within 10% differences.
Strategy four seems to be optimal.

(defun expinv(bits)
   "computes numerator and denominator of exp(1) via continued
   (let* ((p0 3)
          (p1 (+ (* 6 p0) 1))
          (q0 1)
          (q1 (+ (* 6 q0) 1))
          (i 10))
          (if (>= (* 2 (integer-length p0)) bits)
              (return-from expinv (list p1 q1)))
          (psetf p1 (+ (* i p1) p0) p0 p1)
          (psetf q1 (+ (* i q1) q0) q0 q1)
          (setf i (+ i 4)))))

(time (progn (expinv 100000) nil))
(time (progn (expinv 500000) nil))
(time (progn (expinv 1000000) nil))

Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://napali.hpl.hp.com/pipermail/gc/attachments/20100202/c4b6d294/attachment.htm

More information about the Gc mailing list