[Gc] RE: Unreviewed^3 patches (Solaris libraries)
hans.boehm at hp.com
Mon Mar 22 13:11:13 PST 2010
[Added gc list, in case someone else there has more insight on the last patch.]
For what it's worth, it looks to me like the closest equivalent to this in the current gc tree is
if test "$GCC" != yes; then
Thus it looks like:
a) We never got the 2.8 patch that created the issue. I'm not sure it matters now.
b) We consistently use -lrt. I remember that was necessary sometime in prehistory, but I have no idea about recent Solaris releases.
I'm sure I'm in a much worse position than Rainer to test any of this. Assuming -lrt is really no longer needed, the patch looks fine to me for the gcc tree, but I'm not sure who should really be approving the change.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rainer Orth [mailto:ro at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE]
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 3:12 AM
> To: gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Jan Hubicka; Uros Bizjak; Boehm, Hans
> Subject: Unreviewed^3 patches
> The following patches have remained unreviewed for some time.
> I've Cc'ed the respective maintainers.
> PATCH: Fix 64-bit profiling on Solaris 10+/x86 (PR target/38085)
> Needs an i386 maintainer. I'd like to backport this to the
> 4.4 branch, too.
> PATCH: Support TLS with Sun as on Solaris 2/x86
> Needs an i386 maintainer.
> PATCH: Support Sun symbol versioning in libssp
> No libssp maintainer is listed, so probably needs a global reviewer.
> PATCH: Only use /usr/lib/lwp in boehm-gc on Solaris 8
> No boehm-gc maintainer is listed either, so I've Cc'ed Hans Boehm.
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
More information about the Gc