[Gc] Performance of bdwgc7.2 had degraded compared to 6.8

Sven Hartrumpf hartrumpf at gmx.net
Wed Nov 24 07:52:11 PST 2010


I combined all measurements (in seconds) done by Manuel in one table -
for easier comparison.

Stay away from 7.2 if you can, I would conclude from this table and
my own benchmarks :-)


          7.2a4 7.2a2 7.1   7.0   7.0a7 6.8
bague     0.76  0.77  0.77  0.76  0.77  0.77
beval     1.33  1.41  1.29  1.41  1.29  1.31
boyer     2.23  2.23  2.13  2.14  2.13  2.15
cgc       0.47  0.48  0.48  0.47  0.48  0.46
conform   1.91  1.91  1.74  1.72  1.73  1.79
earley    2.49  2.50  2.08  2.13  2.09  2.23
fib       0.01  0.01  0.01  0.01  0.01  0.01
fft       2.51  2.52  2.52  2.50  2.52  2.49
leval     1.12  1.13  1.05  1.01  1.02  1.09
maze      1.67  1.40  1.36  1.35  1.26  1.39
mbrot     7.03  7.05  7.04  7.03  7.05  7.05
nucleic   1.18  1.20  1.20  1.16  1.16  1.34
peval     1.46  1.47  1.20  1.19  1.20  1.18
puzzle    1.96  1.92  1.97  1.96  1.92  1.93
queens    2.29  2.29  1.55  1.56  1.55  1.44
qsort     1.65  1.64  1.63  1.62  1.63  1.63
rgc       1.28  1.28  1.23  1.23  1.24  1.28
sieve     1.58  1.60  1.44  1.42  1.41  1.51
traverse  5.14  5.15  3.55  3.60  3.56  3.58
almabench 1.45  1.45  1.45  1.45  1.45  1.46
SUM      39.52 39.41 35.69 35.72 35.47 36.09


More information about the Gc mailing list