ivmai at mail.ru
Wed May 25 09:25:13 PDT 2011
1. Could you retest the recent CVS on you HPUX and AIX targets (this is not related to the bugs reported - I've added a new test (threadkey_test.c) and not sure whether it passes)? This is not really urgent - a week or two would be nice. Thanks.
2. Regarding 2 unsolved bugs reported by you - just in case: if this is a regression (i.e. you know a particular older version of GC working on your targets) then I'll spend some more time finding out how to fix them.
Mon, 23 May 2011 21:55:07 -0500 "Peter O'Gorman" <pogma at thewrittenword.com>:
> Hi Ivan,
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:06:22AM +0400, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > Thank you but I don't have time to look into these systems.
> That's fine. Thanks again for all your help.
> > I've spent some time trying to get PROC_VDB work on Solaris 10u9 x86 as well
> as trying to prevent signal loss on Solaris observed in threadkey_test.c, and
> both without any success.
> > May be someone else wants to debug GC and solve the problems on that
> > Regards.
> > Wed, 18 May 2011 13:41:57 -0500 "Peter O'Gorman" <pogma at thewrittenword.com>:
> > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:05:36AM +0400, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> > > > Hi Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Could you try the latest CVS snapshot on your targets where you observed
> > > hung.
> > >
> > > Hi Ivan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for keeping on looking at this. I tried todays CVS on Solaris
> > > 8, and HP-UX 11.32/PA_RISC and gctest still hung.
> > >
> > > I have cut the list in this message to ask you if you would like access
> > > to these systems to try and debug the problems yourself?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Peter
More information about the Gc