Re: Fwd: [Gc] [PATCH 0/2]: Port of GC to new CPU architecture
ivmai at mail.ru
Fri Oct 7 23:59:31 PDT 2011
Thank you. (In fact I had a chance to glance it quickly yesterday.) I'll commit them both to master branch (i.e. not to 7.2 release) on Mon or Tue.
BTW. Do you have any opinion of Petter's proposed finalization API (I'm really ready to merge it to master branch)? - https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/tree/paurkedal-disclaim-v2
He also prepared C++0x stdatomic implementation in libatomic_ops - https://github.com/paurkedal/libatomic_ops/tree/t/stdatomic/
08 10 2011, 00:41 "Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at hp.com>:
> Ivan -
> FWIW, I looked at these quickly, and don't immediately see any problems with the code.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gc-bounces at linux.hpl.hp.com [mailto:gc-bounces at linux.hpl.hp.com] On Behalf Of Linas Vepstas
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:14 PM
> To: gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: [Gc] [PATCH 0/2]: Port of GC to new CPU architecture
> The next two emails contain a port of the Boehm GC to a new
> architecture, the Qualcomm hexagon. This is a new 32-bit VLIW
> DSP with a full MMU, making it a bona-fide CPU. It runs Linux,
> gcc, glibc, etc. and so the port was straight-forward. I'm sending
> the patches in LKML-style, assuming that makes it easier.
> As I fear that my mail client will mangle tabs & etc. I'll copy the
> patch into the email, *and* also include it as an attachment, for
> convenience. Please apply!
> -- Linas
> Gc mailing list
> Gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
More information about the Gc