[Gc] Exporting GC_set_mark_bit and GC_clear_mark_bit
Petter Urkedal
urkedal at nbi.dk
Sat Jan 7 06:29:17 PST 2012
On 2012-01-07, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> Hi Petter and Hans,
>
> Hans -
> What do you think?
>
> Petter -
> declspec for func definition should match func declaration i.e. if should add GC_API_PRIV for definitions.
> But: by current design, GC_API_PRIV is used for functions that should be private but used by some tests, so I think it's better, if it would be considered to make these functions public, to move the to some public header (e.g., gc_mark.h) and use GC_API declspec and GC_CALL calling conv modifier.
I see, I interpreted it as "public use at your own risk". Moving it to
gc_mark.h sounds good. It would be nice to stop including private
headers. I can prepare a new patch, but:
- Do we want to move "typedef int GC_bool" to "gc.h"? Maybe also add
GC_TRUE and GC_FALSE there (but leave TRUE and FALSE in gc_priv.h)?
Or do we change the return type of GC_is_marked to "int"?
- I'll add a comment that the client must hold the allocation lock.
Maybe GC_is_marked is safe enough to call without, but I don't think
the result is very useful without locking.
>
> Regards
>
> 07 января 2012, 15:37 от Petter Urkedal <urkedal at nbi.dk>:
> > May I ask that the GC_set_mark_bit and GC_clear_mark_bit are exported?
> > I use them as part of the code to resurrect objects in weak hash-tables.
> > Imitating GC_is_marked I think this should do:
> > https://github.com/paurkedal/bdwgc/commit/20652be420b7c38fab92ac2601b4210386df4a7e
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Petter
More information about the Gc
mailing list