Re[2]: [Gc] Boehm GC on OSF/1
Ivan Maidanski
ivmai at mail.ru
Sat Jan 21 03:30:52 PST 2012
Hi Andy and Bruno,
19 01 2012, 02:05 Andy Wingo <wingo at pobox.com>:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> On Wed 18 Jan 2012 15:05, Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru> writes:
>
> > Please stop reporting me failures on gc-7.2alpha6 (or any other
> > ancient release) without any feedback using the latest code from
> > "release" branch. Could you retest all failures you've just reported?
>
> I completely understand your perspective :) Part of the context here is
> that we have a new Guile release coming out, and Bruno is helping to
> test it on less common platforms. It's much easier to test a tarball
> than a git repo, so I think that's where he's coming from. Do you think
> it might be time for another 7.2 alpha release? A 7.2 final release of
> course would be wonderful, but first things first :-)
Yes, it seems yet one more alpha release would be a plus.
Nonetheless, Bruno, your feedback about found problems in "release" version of both bdwgc and libatomic_ops is very appreciated (at least it worth putting the info into FIXME section of TODO file - https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/blob/master/TODO)
Regards.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Gc mailing list
> Gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/
>
More information about the Gc
mailing list