Re: [Gc] There should be a library major bump of gc library
ivmai at mail.ru
Sat Jun 2 10:11:23 PDT 2012
Hi Paulo and Juan,
Sorry for the delay.
I decided to prepare the required fix myself.
Proposed changes for 7.2 ("gc-7_2-hotfix-2" branch): https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/compare/release...4be945a8 (2 commits, public headers are unchanged)
For 7.3alpha3 ("master" branch): https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/compare/f85b8bf6bd...master (3 commits, one of which is the same as for release branch, 4 functions added to GC API)
Please test both branches. If the fix solves the problem then I'm sure we'll release 7.2c tarball soon.
Mon, 28 May 2012 11:09:21 -0300 от Paulo César Pereira de Andrade<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade at gmail.com>:
> 2012/5/28 Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru>:
> > Hi Paulo,
> > Mon, 28 May 2012 02:22:13 -0300 от Paulo César Pereira de
> Andrade<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade at gmail.com>:
> >> 2012/5/27 Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru>:
> >> > Hi Juan and Paulo,
> >> >
> >> > Paulo -
> >> > I've quickly glanced into the commits. I think it is not a good (or even
> disallowed) thing to alter 7.2 API (unlike v7.3+).
> >> > The only commits to release branch now are the ones fixing some bugs or
> regression (hiding some symbols actively used by 3rd-party well-know projects
> could be considered as a regression). (The only reason for making such fixing
> should be making legacy code work as expected nothing more.)
> >> Fedora 16 has 7.2alpha, and same for Fedora 17 beta, so it will
> >> have all symbols exported there (ecl works), but rawhide was
> >> update to 7.2 release 14 May.
> > Exactly. We need to fix this regression in 7.2.
> >> > I guess Hans is having the similar opinion of it.
> >> >
> >> > So, part of your patch is definitely ok for master branch. But no code of
> it suitable for release branch for now.
> >> > Thank you for the quick response but please adjust it (being more close
> to the fix scenario I've outlined in my previous post).
> >> Ok. The commit in master adds the GC_push* required by ecl.
> >> It should be ok to make a "request for enhancement" in Fedora
> >> rawhide to update to gc-7.3alpha if the commit to master is good.
> > This should be optional if we fix 7.2.
> I think there is some misunderstanding of how to present the patches, not
> the patches themselves :-) As they correct the problem for ecl with gc
> release branch and master.
> Attempting to make it simpler to understand what I did, files
> should be applied to release branch, and file
> should be applied to master.
> > Regards,
> > Ivan
> Gc mailing list
> Gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
More information about the Gc