Re: [Gc] There should be a library major bump of gc library
ivmai at mail.ru
Tue Jun 5 02:07:20 PDT 2012
Hi Paulo, Juan and Tsugutomo,
Could you please check the code that is 7.2c candidate (before we make a tarball) and confirm that it works and solves the problems mentioned by you: https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/tree/gc-7_2-hotfix-2
Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:18:54 -0400 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade at gmail.com>:
> 2012/6/2 Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru>:
> > Hi Paulo and Juan,
> Hi Ivan,
> > Sorry for the delay.
> No problems :-)
> > I decided to prepare the required fix myself.
> > Proposed changes for 7.2 ("gc-7_2-hotfix-2" branch): https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/compare/release...4be945a8 (2 commits, public headers are unchanged)
> > For 7.3alpha3 ("master" branch): https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/compare/f85b8bf6bd...master (3 commits, one of which is the same as for release branch, 4 functions added to GC API)
> I think it is a far better compromise then my patch to declare the functions
> in the "release" branch, and just not hide them. I applied a diff to 7.2b
> (it was updated to 7.2b in fedora rawhide a few days ago), rebuilt fedora rpm,
> installed it, then built ecl, and it did build everything correctly,
> that is, it did
> load, compile lisp code, etc.
> > Please test both branches. If the fix solves the problem then I'm sure we'll release 7.2c tarball soon.
> I also tested the build from branch master, and it corrects the ecl issues,
> and works in a full ecl build.
> I am waiting for gc-7.2c :-)
> > Regards,
> > Ivan
More information about the Gc