[Gc] Re: boehm-gc merge for GCC
nightstrike at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 13:14:12 PST 2012
I think changing the gc to be like gmp/mpfr/mpc requires buy-in from
Andrew Haley, if I'm not mistaken.
Kai, is my statement correct?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru> wrote:
> Hi NightStrike,
> In my understanding, I've done bdwgc ready for gcj but some gcj files should
> be changed to reflect the changes in bdwgc API (e.g., thread registration).
> There is a problem is thread suspend/resume - bdwgc does not have such API
> but OTOH suspend/resume is deprecated part of Java threads. Regarding
> integration bdwgc into gcj, I think it's better to have bdwgc as a separate
> module (similar to libmpfr).
> I have an intention to do the work but this requires significant efforts to
> make it perfect, so I gave up due to lack of time.
> Any volunteers?
> 16 11 2012 15:28:34 from NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail.com>:
> Are there any plans to get current boehm-gc into gcc? Ivan, can you do this?
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ivan Maidanski <ivmai at mail.ru> wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>> I think yes, all patches (may be with some modifications) from Kai are in
>> I myself also reviewed difference between gcc/boehm-gc
>> (https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/tree/gcc_boehmgc) and gc6.8.
>> 16 11 2012 18:22:47 Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com>:
>> Hi Ivan,
>> Kai said that he did some patches upstream / to you about changes
>> the GCC copy of boehm-gc. Are these integrated in your branch/trunk, or
>> you forward these to me? I didn't get any feedback from Kai this week,
>> asking you directly.
>> Thanks, Matthias
More information about the Gc