Beyond
the Digital Divide
www.economist.com
March 11th 2004
Development: Amid much worthy talk of "bridging the digital
divide", technology firms have realised that fostering
the adoption of information technology in the developing world
would not just benefit locals, but is in vendors' best interests
as well
THE gleaming Indian headquarters of Hewlett-Packard, an American
computing giant, are testament to India's technology-led boom.
The glass-panelled tower, located on a busy Bangalore thoroughfare,
swarms with a new breed of well-heeled urban professionals.
But inside the building, in a warren of cubicles on the second
floor, a rather different customer is being targeted. Engineers
and programmers at HP Labs, the company's research arm, are
working on low-cost devices for the three-quarters of Indians
who still live in the countryside. In one room, a cheap e-mail
device that allows messages to be sent in local languages
is on display; in another sits a tablet-shaped PC that lets
users fill out government forms in Indian scripts.
These technologies are part of HP's ambitious plans to sell
to the 4 billion poorest people at the bottom of the global
economic pyramid. In addition to work being done at the HP
Labs, the company has also invested resources in its "e-inclusion"
initiative, a project designed to set up "Digital Villages"
and "i-communities" around the world--the former
are philanthropic projects, the latter strategic market
investments. Several centres--in India, South Africa, Ghana
and Brazil--have already been established.
All of this activity could easily be mistaken for yet another
philanthropic effort to bridge the "digital divide"
between rich and poor. But that is only part of the story.
Anand Tawker, the head of HP's e-inclusion efforts in Asia,
speaks of a "blended strategy" that creates social
benefits at the same time as boosting HP's brand and sales.
"In the process of creating social value, there is also
a profitable return to HP," he says. "Doing good
and doing well are not mutually exclusive."
HP is somewhat ahead of the curve, but it is not alone. Companies
around the world are now busy developing low-cost devices
and innovative business models to reach the world's poor.
Intel, the world's largest chipmaker, is pushing cheap wireless-data
systems as the best way to extend connectivity to rural areas.
Vodacom, South Africa's largest mobile operator, has set up
"phone shops" where rural entrepreneurs can buy
and resell airtime. And the Indian Institute of Technology
(IIT) in Chennai recently unveiled a stripped-down cash-dispenser
that it plans to take to the masses in partnership with private-sector
banks.
Of course, the idea that the poor constitute an untapped
market is hardly new. Hindustan Lever, a subsidiary of Unilever,
pioneered the idea years ago, marketing its shampoos and detergents
in single-use sachets rather than larger (and more expensive)
bottles. But the increasing ubiquity--and falling cost--of
digital networks has heightened interest in these markets
for at least two reasons. First, such networks increase information
transparency, allowing, for instance, farmers or fishermen
to sell their produce to the highest bidder, rather than just
to the nearest market. This in turn creates new markets and
expands existing ones. Second, dispersed electronic databases
can aggregate demand, opening up low-margin markets that depend
on high volumes for their viability.
In a celebrated article published in the HARVARD BUSINESS
REVIEW in 2002, C. K. Prahalad of the University of Michigan
and Allen Hammond of the World Resources Institute, an environmental
think-tank, pointed out that the collective buying power of
the poor in Rio de Janeiro is $1.2 billion. Ashok Jhunjhunwala
of IIT-Chennai, who has been instrumental in bringing several
technologies to rural markets, points out that there are 600,000
villages in India alone. "Give me profit margins of just
one rupee, and I'll be happy," he says.
While such numbers are indeed striking, and heartening to
would-be rural entrepreneurs, the challenge lies in the implementation.
Mike Best of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who
has worked in rural markets in Africa and Asia, points out
that many developing countries (he cites Ghana as an example)
lack the requisite connectivity. In addition, aggregated demand
in, say, Madagascar, with a population of 17m, is unlikely
to yield the same economies of scale as in India. And with
its multitude of languages and cultures, even India poses
difficulties.
Some of the difficulties may have technical solutions. To
deal with the problem of multiple languages, HP is devising
character-recognition systems capable of recognising a variety
of scripts. The engineers at IIT-Chennai are implementing
a fingerprint-recognition system in their cash dispensersthat
would save the (often illiterate) villagers from having to
remember a personal identification number.
But perhaps the best reason to be optimistic is that the
companies in question are driven by a powerful motivator that
is lacking in donor-led rural programmes: profit. Mr Tawker,
for example, happily characterises HP's efforts as a long-term
strategic response to saturation and slower growth in the
company's traditional markets. Now, the technologists just
have to devise the technological equivalent of shampoo sachets.
Click
here to read the article at the ECONOMIST website.
(You may be required to loginat the Economist website to read
the article)
|