Re: Patch to efs.el 1.14 (beta) for (set-visited-file-modtime 0)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Terry Stroup: "EFS 1.14 bug"
• Previous message: Sandy Rutherford: "Re: Patch to efs.el 1.14 (beta) for (set-visited-file-modtime 0)"
• In reply to: Sandy Rutherford: "Re: Patch to efs.el 1.14 (beta) for (set-visited-file-modtime 0)"

Sandy writes:

> Thanks for the patch.  It seems that Xemacs needs '(0 0), whereas FSF
> Emacs will take 0.  I've tested, and I don't think that using '(0 0)
> causes FSF Emacs any harm.

> Andy, does this seem right to you?

I've seen an almost identical patch for XEmacs zoom through the efs lists when
the XEmacs 19.12-betas started being tested, so I'm pretty confident that this
may be the right XEmacs solution.

I have to admit that I don't have FSF Emacs (or whatever pretty acronym keeps
RMS happy today) on any of my workstations or laptops.

Can anybody on efs-bugs who uses FSF Emacs check this out and report back.

					-- ange -- <><

					ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com

 When PRIVACY Is Outlawed...Only OUTLAWS Will Have Privacy!
     I SUPPORT THE PHIL ZIMMERMANN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND!
 Email: zldf@clark.net      http://www.netresponse.com/zldf

• Next message: Terry Stroup: "EFS 1.14 bug"
• Previous message: Sandy Rutherford: "Re: Patch to efs.el 1.14 (beta) for (set-visited-file-modtime 0)"
• In reply to: Sandy Rutherford: "Re: Patch to efs.el 1.14 (beta) for (set-visited-file-modtime 0)"