Re: Comments on the HTTP/1.0 draft.

Roy T. Fielding (fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU)
Thu, 01 Dec 1994 18:16:43 -0800 

Chuck Shotton writes:

> IMHO, it should state that CR, LF, and CRLF should all be interpreted
> equally as EOL when used as line ends. This avoids any problems with
> machine dependent EOL symbols, and fairly represents the current practice.
> (It also avoids forcing clients and especially servers to do line-by-line
> translations of EOL for all outgoing response information, which is a BIG
> performance hit.)

Sounds reasonable to me.


......Roy Fielding   ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine  USA
                                     <fielding@ics.uci.edu>
                     <URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/dir/grad/Software/fielding>