Re: "Hits" pragma

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Roy Fielding: "Re: Comment on http 1.0 draft 01: authentication and caching"
• Previous message: Roy Fielding: "HTTP/1.0 draft 02"
• In reply to: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Next in thread: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Next in thread: Brian Behlendorf: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Reply: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"

"Balint Nagy Endre" <bne@bne.ind.eunet.hu> mentions:

>I presume we shall incorporate the hits pragma in the ongoing version of the
>HTTP draft as a must requirement.

The protocol does not require any Pragma directives.  If it is a requirement,
it is made based on the system semantics (e.g., WWW) rather than at
the protocol level.

I am generally against making anything a requirement if it hasn't
already been implemented and demonstrated to be a defacto requirement.


 ....Roy T. Fielding  Department of ICS, University of California, Irvine USA
                      Visiting Scholar, MIT/LCS + World-Wide Web Consortium
                      (fielding@w3.org)                (fielding@ics.uci.edu)

• Next message: Roy Fielding: "Re: Comment on http 1.0 draft 01: authentication and caching"
• Previous message: Roy Fielding: "HTTP/1.0 draft 02"
• In reply to: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Next in thread: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Next in thread: Brian Behlendorf: "Re: "Hits" pragma"
• Reply: Balint Nagy Endre: "Re: "Hits" pragma"