Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Previous message: Larry Masinter: "CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Reply: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"

At 06:25 pm 2/22/96 PST, Larry Masinter spake:
>CGI is currently not mentioned in either HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1. I'm a
>little wary about discussion of CGI in HTTP-WG, except insofar as the
>existance of CGI might put some constraints on the 'typical HTTP
>implementation'. 

   Just for clarity, Larry, are you saying that the discussion 
of the subject of CGI as it relates to the persistent session 
draft is off-topic on this list? 

   And if so, is all discussion of CGI in relation to HTTP off-topic 
on this list? 


+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| BearHeart / Bill Weinman | BearHeart@bearnet.com | http://www.bearnet.com/ 
| Author of The CGI Book -- http://www.bearnet.com/cgibook/ 

• Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Previous message: Larry Masinter: "CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"
• Reply: Larry Masinter: "Re: CGI in HTTP standards documents"