Re: HTTP working group status & issues (please reply)
Maurizio Codogno (mau@beatles.cselt.stet.it)
Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:10:44 +0200
% - GET-with-body or idempotent-POST
% Discussed on the working group; there seems to be enough
% demand, but not a lot of clarity on the solution.
% *** I'd like a brief note from you about your opinion,
% especially if you haven't responded on this before.
I personally don't like very much an idempotent-POST: if I have an
incremental database, POSTing twice should result in two record added.
Netscape "repost form data?" checkbox is however a good idea, IMO, and
maybe it could be further developed to content everybody.
% - versioning & distributed authoring
% The versioning/distributed authoring group(s) are making
% good progress on requirements and proposals.
% *** Opinions about 'same group' vs 'separate group'?
Don't care. I feel that versioning can bear the complexity which
distributed authoring adds.
% *** Is this schedule OK with you?
Yes .
ciao, .mau.