Re: HTTP response version, again

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Shel Kaphan: "HTTP response version, again"
• Previous message: M. Hedlund: "Re: HTTP response version, again"
• Maybe in reply to: Shel Kaphan: "HTTP response version, again"
• Next in thread: David W. Morris: "Re: HTTP response version, again"
• Reply: David W. Morris: "Re: HTTP response version, again"

>If it were only proxies, I would agree, but fixing broken clients is a lot
>harder (that is, getting client users to upgrade is harder than getting
>proxy maintainers to do so).  It seems imminently desirable to ease
>protocol upgrades, and case #1 would do so.

Getting users to upgrade their clients is incredibly easy if said clients no
longer function.

-----
Daniel DuBois, Traveling Coderman        www.spyglass.com/~ddubois
   o  The Heroes of Might and Magic II Bible is here!
      http://www.spyglass.com/~ddubois/HOMM2.html

• Next message: Shel Kaphan: "HTTP response version, again"
• Previous message: M. Hedlund: "Re: HTTP response version, again"
• Maybe in reply to: Shel Kaphan: "HTTP response version, again"
• Next in thread: David W. Morris: "Re: HTTP response version, again"
• Reply: David W. Morris: "Re: HTTP response version, again"