HTTP/1.1 (RFC 2068) wording nit

Dave Kristol (dmk@research.bell-labs.com)
Fri, 10 Jan 97 10:48:11 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jurgen Bettels: "Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header"
Previous message: Chris Lilley: "Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header"

Section 11.1 Basic Authentication Scheme

The non-terminal "basic-cookie" may lead to incorrect associations or
inferences with HTTP State Management, aka "cookies".  I propose the
replacement "enc-user-pass" or "base64-user-pass".

Dave Kristol

Next message: Jurgen Bettels: "Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header"
Previous message: Chris Lilley: "Re: Please clarify * is legal in HTTP1/1 Accept-Charset Header"