Re: HTTP practice and Year-2000: the bad(?) news

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• Previous message: Ari Luotonen: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• In reply to: Andrew Daviel: "Re: HTTP practice and Year-2000: the bad(?) news"

> > After all the problem will go away in 2000 for the
> > rest of our lifetime.
> 
> .. how about 32-bit problems in 2038, if our hardware lasts that long ?
> (I hope that's within my lifetime, with a bit of luck!)

Well, this may be a slightly inappropriate remark, but I'll be pretty
damn pissed off if we're still stuck using HTTP/1.x in 2038. ;) ;) ;)

Cheers,
--
Ari Luotonen, Mail-Stop MV-061		Opinions my own, not Netscape's.
Netscape Communications Corp.		ari@netscape.com
501 East Middlefield Road		http://home.netscape.com/people/ari/
Mountain View, CA 94043, USA		Netscape Proxy Server Development

• Next message: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• Previous message: Ari Luotonen: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• In reply to: Andrew Daviel: "Re: HTTP practice and Year-2000: the bad(?) news"