Re: STATUS100 Re: Proposed resolution
David W. Morris (dwm@xpasc.com)
Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > o An origin server SHOULD NOT send a 100 (Continue) response if
> > has already received some or all of the request body for the
> > corresponding request.
>
> Likewise, inappropriate. Recommendations should be presented as
> recommendations, not as requirements.
In my proposal, this point was only intended as an optimization permission
or recomentation. I didn't want to preclude a server which had the
information from bypassing the 100 (Continue) so I would be happy with
any wording which expressed the exception case allowing the omission.
Either:
o An origin server need not send a 100 (continue) response if it ...
missing? ^^
(which I agree feels like awkward wording) or:
o It is not necessary for an origin server (or proxy) to send a
100 (Continue) response if it has already received some or all
of the request body for the corresponding request.
Dave