Re: 301/302
Foteos Macrides (MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU)
Tue, 29 Jul 1997 19:42:27 -0500 (EST)
"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu> wrote:
>As Foteos hinted, swapping the meaning of 302 and 303 is a solution
>to the implementation problem. I don't think it would affect Apache much.
>However, it would require universal agreement among the rest of the
>implementers, and it would require recycling HTTP/1.1 as Proposed
>and not as a Draft Standard. It is not something to be taken lightly.
Unfortunately, when I get stuff I wrote back from a list server
and re-read it, it often becomes clear that I don't understand what
I'm talking about. For a 301 on a POST, does that really mean
substitute the new RequestURI for all future submissions, or only
when the content is identical to that of the current submission?
Fote
=========================================================================
Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
=========================================================================