Re: 301/302

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Patrick McManus: "Re: Implementation Experience Content Encoding"
• Previous message: Patrick McManus: "Implementation Experience Content Encoding"
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "301/302"
• Next in thread: Lou Montulli: "Re: 301/302"

John Franks wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> >
> > OK. It still seems to me that the correct thing to do is to fix CGI. A
> > simple thing to do would be to add a version header:
> >
> > CGI-Version: 1.1
> >
> > Absence of the header means the script is 1.0 compliant. This is not an
> > HTTP header - the server would strip it, I assume, and doctor other
> > headers as needed.
> >
> 
> The current (widely deployed) version of CGI is called version 1.1.
> This has nothing to do with HTTP versions.  Thus something other
> than "CGI-Version: 1.1" would be advisable to avoid confusion.

Sorry - I realised that as I was hitting send... I'd suggest
CGI-HTTP-Version instead.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie                Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435  Email:
ben@algroup.co.uk
Freelance Consultant and  Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director        URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
A.L. Digital Ltd,         Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)
London, England.          Apache-SSL author

• Next message: Patrick McManus: "Re: Implementation Experience Content Encoding"
• Previous message: Patrick McManus: "Implementation Experience Content Encoding"
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "301/302"
• Next in thread: Lou Montulli: "Re: 301/302"