Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:46:51 PST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Henry Sanders: "RE: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"

> I think the answer hinges mainly on the use of "absolute URIs" in the
> 'alternates' draft, which seems (at best) rather awkward when trying to
> refer to body parts within the same MIME entity.  But I am not well
> qualified in this matter.

The 'cid:' URI is used just for this purpose: to refer to body parts within the
same MIME entity. (RFC 2111: Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource
Locators.)

Larry

Next message: Henry Sanders: "RE: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"