Re: de facto standard of HTTP

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jim Gettys: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"
• Previous message: Daniel Hellerstein: "http and ranges"
• Maybe in reply to: wendy@cs.ualberta.ca: "de facto standard of HTTP"
• Next in thread: Jim Gettys: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"

Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com wrote:
> 
> > Apache does not use HTTP-NG.
> 
> You might be interested to learn that we're using a modified version of Apache
> in our HTTP-NG testbed.  But we haven't yet got as good an integration as we'd
> like, and there are not yet any browsers that speak HTTP-NG, so this is just
> FYI, not anything we can recommend to users right now.

Apache 2.0 (which is multithreaded). OTOH, we need to sort out the I/O
layer abstraction first. Input welcome.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie            |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant  |Fax:   +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd,     |Apache-SSL author     http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England.      |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/

WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.uk/

• Next message: Jim Gettys: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"
• Previous message: Daniel Hellerstein: "http and ranges"
• Maybe in reply to: wendy@cs.ualberta.ca: "de facto standard of HTTP"
• Next in thread: Jim Gettys: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"