<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="results.xsl" ?><root>
<item>
 <title>Feedback loops of attention in peer production</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/feedbacks/feedbacks.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Why does the distribution of user contributions obey a power law?</minidescription>
 <description>A significant percentage of online content is now
published and consumed via the mechanism of crowdsourcing.
While any user can contribute to these forums, a disproportionately
large percentage of the content is submitted by very active
and devoted users, whose continuing participation is key to the
sites’ success. As we show, people’s propensity to keep participating
increases the more they contribute, suggesting motivating
factors which increase over time. This paper demonstrates that
submitters who stop receiving attention tend to stop contributing,
while prolific contributors attract an ever increasing number of
followers and their attention in a feedback loop. We demonstrate
that this mechanism leads to the observed power law in the
number of contributions per user and support our assertions
by an analysis of hundreds of millions of contributions to top
content sharing websites Digg.com and Youtube.com.</description>
 <author>Fang Wu, Dennis M. Wilkinson and Bernardo Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>2009-05-04 23:13:00</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>crowdsourcing</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Crowdsourcing, Attention and Productivity</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/crowd/crowd.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How to solve the digital commons dilemma.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>The tragedy of the digital commons does not seem to prevent the
copious voluntary production of content that one witnesses in the web.
We show through an analysis of a massive data set from Youtube that
the productivity exhibited in crowdsourcing exhibits a strong positive
dependence on attention, measured by the number of downloads.
Conversely, a lack of attention leads to a decrease in the number of
videos uploaded and the consequent drop in productivity, which in
many cases asymptotes to no uploads whatsoever. Moreover, we observed
that uploaders compare themselves to others when having low
productivity and to themselves when exceeding a personal threshold.
	</description>
	<author>Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero and Fang Wu</author>
  <pubDate>2008-09-11 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>How public opinion forms</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/howopinions/wine.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How web discourse evolves.

To appear in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Internet and Network Economics-2008
</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>opinion formation</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>polarization</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>
	<tag>WINE</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>No aspect of the massive participation in content creation
that the web enables is more evident than in the countless number of
opinions, news and product reviews that are constantly posted on the
Internet. Given their importance we have analyzed their temporal evo-
lution in a number of scenarios. We have found that while ignorance
of previous views leads to a uniform sampling of the range of opinions
among a community, exposure of previous opinions to potential review-
ers induces a trend following process which leads to the expression of
increasingly extreme views. Moreover, when the expression of an opinion
is costly and previous views are known, a selection bias softens the ex-
treme views, as people exhibit a tendency to speak out differently from
previous opinions. These findings are not only robust but also suggest
simple procedures to extract given types of opinions from the population
at large.
	</description>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
  <pubDate>2008-09-11 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>
</root>