<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="results.xsl" ?><root>
<item>
  <title>Crowdsourcing, Attention and Productivity</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/crowd/crowd.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How to solve the digital commons dilemma.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>The tragedy of the digital commons does not seem to prevent the
copious voluntary production of content that one witnesses in the web.
We show through an analysis of a massive data set from Youtube that
the productivity exhibited in crowdsourcing exhibits a strong positive
dependence on attention, measured by the number of downloads.
Conversely, a lack of attention leads to a decrease in the number of
videos uploaded and the consequent drop in productivity, which in
many cases asymptotes to no uploads whatsoever. Moreover, we observed
that uploaders compare themselves to others when having low
productivity and to themselves when exceeding a personal threshold.
	</description>
	<author>Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero and Fang Wu</author>
  <pubDate>2008-09-11 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How Do People Respond to Reputation: Ostracize, Price Discriminate or Punish?</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/reputationExpt/reputation-expts-and-Prosper.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How people use reputation information.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	  <tag>incentive design</tag>
	  <tag>experimental economics</tag>
  </tags> 
  <description>We evaluated how people use reputation in a laboratory market and in
Prosper, an online microfinance business. We found people use
information on past behavior to ostracize previous poor performance
in both cases. The laboratory market did not show significant price
discrimination, but people used their ability to not fulfill
contracts to punish poor performers. Price discrimination was
significantly correlated with reputation in Prosper. Thus we find
people apply multiple strategies to deal with reputation.
	</description>
	<author>Kay-Yut Chen, Scott Golder, Tad Hogg and Cecilia Zenteno</author>
  <pubDate>2008-08-19 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Experimental Study of Reputation Mechanisms in an Exchange Economy</title>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/reputationExpt/index.html</link>
	<minidescription>Revealing past behavior improves market efficiency</minidescription>
	<tags>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	  <tag>experimental economics</tag>
        </tags> 
	<description>(click link to view abstract)</description>
	<author>Kay-Yut Chen, Tad Hogg and Nathan Wozny</author>
	<pubDate>2007-01-01 00:00:00</pubDate>
</item>
</root>