<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Information Dynamics Lab : HP Labs : Latest Results</title>
<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/</link>
<description>Recent papers from HP Labs' Information Dynamics Lab</description><item>
  <title>Admission Control in a Computational Market</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Thomas_Sandholm/sandholm2008a.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>Tradeoffs between using spot and reservation markets.</minidescription>
  <description>We propose, implement and evaluate three admission models for
computational Grids. The models
take the expected demand into account and
offer a specific performance guarantee.
The main issue addressed is how users and providers should
make the tradeoff
between a best effort (low guarantee) spot market and
an admission controlled (high guarantee) reservation market.
Using a realistically modeled high performance
computing workload and utility models of user preferences,
we run experiments highlighting the conditions under which
different markets and admission models are efficient.
The experimental results show that providers can make
large efficiency gains if the admission model is chosen
dynamically based on the current load, likewise we show that
users have an opportunity to optimize their
job performance by carefully picking the right market
based on the state of the system, and the characteristics
of the application to be run. Finally, we provide simple
functional expressions that can guide both users and
providers when making decisions about guarantee
levels to request or offer.
	</description>
	<author>Thomas Sandholm, Kevin Lai, and Scott Clearwater</author>
  <date>2008-06-06 12:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Public discourse in the web does not exhibit group polarization</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/opinion_expression/</link>
  <minidescription>How opinions evolve online.</minidescription>
	<description>We performed a massive study of the dynamics of group delibera-
tion among several websites containing millions of opinions on topics
ranging from books to media. Contrary to the common phenomenon
of group polarization observed offline, we measured a strong tendency
towards moderate views in the course of time. This phenomenon possi-
bly operates through a self-selection bias whereby previous comments
and ratings elicit contrarian views that soften the previous opinions.</description>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
  <date>2008-05-15 17:00:00</date>
</item>
<item>
        <title>Strong regularities in online peer production</title>
        <author>Dennis M. Wilkinson</author>
        <date>2008-04-10 00:00:00</date>
        <description>Online peer production systems have enabled people to 
coactively create, share, classify, and rate content on an unprecedented scale.
This paper describes strong macroscopic regularities in how people
contribute to peer production systems, and shows how these regularities
arise from simple dynamical rules. First, it is demonstrated
that the probability a person stops contributing varies inversely with
the number of contributions he has made. This rule leads to a power
law distribution for the number of contributions per person in which
a small number of very active users make most of the contributions.
The rule also implies that the power law exponent is proportional to
the effort required to contribute, as justified by the data. Second, the
level of activity per topic is shown to follow a lognormal distribution
generated by a stochastic reinforcement mechanism. A small
number of very popular topics thus accumulate the vast majority of
contributions. These trends are demonstrated to hold across hundreds
of millions of contributions to four disparate peer production
systems of differing scope, interface style, and purpose..</description>
        <minidescription>Simple behavioral rules hold across hundreds of millions of contributions to disparate online peer production efforts.</minidescription> 
        <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/regularities/</link>
</item>


<item>
	<title>Measuring Social Networks with Digital Photograph Collections</title>
	<author>Scott A. Golder</author>
	<date>2008-04-09 00:00:00</date>
	<description>The ease and lack of cost associated with taking digital photographs have allowed people to amass large personal photograph collections. These collections contain valuable information about their owners' social relationships. This paper is a preliminary investigation into how digital photo collections can provide useful data for the study of social networks. Results from an analysis of 23 subjects photo collections demonstrate the feasibility of this approach. The relationship between perceived closeness and network position, as well as future questions, are also discussed.</description>
	<minidescription>Digital photo archives contain valuable information about individuals' social networks.</minidescription>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/sna-photos/</link>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Diversity of Online Community Activities</title>
	<author>Tad Hogg and Gabor Szabo</author>
	<date>2008-03-25 0:00:00</date>
	<description>Web sites where users create and rate content as well as form networks with other users display long-tailed distributions in many aspects of behavior. Using behavior on one such community site, Essembly, we propose and evaluate plausible mechanisms to explain these behaviors. Unlike purely descriptive models, these mechanisms rely on user behaviors based on information available locally to each user. For Essembly, we find the long-tails arise from large differences among user activity rates and qualities of the rated content, as well as the extensive variability in the time users devote to the site. We show that the models not only explain overall behavior but also allow estimating the quality of content from their early behaviors.
	</description>
	<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3482</link>
	<minidescription>Diversity among users and the content they create in the Essembly web site</minidescription>
</item>


<item>
	<title>Popularity, novelty and attention</title>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
	<date>2008-01-24 0:00:00</date>
	<description>We analyze the role that popularity and novelty play in attracting
the attention of users to dynamic websites. We do so by determining
the performance of three different strategies that can be utilized to
maximize attention. The first one prioritizes novelty while the second
emphasizes popularity. A third strategy looks myopically into
the future and prioritizes stories that are expected to generate the
most clicks within the next few minutes. We show that the first two
strategies should be selected on the basis of the rate of novelty decay,
while the third strategy performs sub-optimally in most cases. We also
demonstrate that the relative performance of the first two strategies
as a function of the rate of novelty decay changes abruptly around a
critical value, resembling a phase transition in the physical world.
	
	</description>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/popularity/popularity.pdf</link>
	<minidescription>Whether to use popularity or novelty to elicit attention</minidescription>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Friends and foes: Ideological social networking / Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks</title>
	<author>Tad Hogg, Gabor Szabo, Dennis M. Wilkinson, and Michael J. Brzozowski</author>
	<date>2008-01-12 0:00:00</date>
	<description>Traditionally, online social network sites like Facebook and MySpace allow people to form links to "friends" but do little to qualify the semantic meaning of the friendship. As a result, many users "collect" friends on these sites, conflating "acquaintances" with "friends". Essembly, a "fiercely non-partisan social network", on the other hand, lets its users enrich the meaning of their relations to others by explicitly labeling them "friends", "allies", or "nemeses". Essembly then allows its members to post resolves reflecting controversial opinions on political issues. As a defining activity on the site, members can vote on these resolves on a four-point scale ranging from complete agreement to full opposition. We examined how the uncommon link semantics affects users in casting their votes. In particular, Essembly prominently highlights the activities of users' acquaintances, and the question arises if this makes them more likely to participate, and if so, how this information affects votes. It is widely assumed that social networks enhance, if not drive, the popularity of online services; what does an additional layer of link classification add to them?
	
	Papers to appear at CHI 2008 and AAAI Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing 2008.</description>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/essembly</link>
	<minidescription>Examines the usefulness of distinguishing between friends and similar/dissimilar users in propagating new content in an online social network, and suggests resulting design implications for social content aggregation services and recommender systems.</minidescription>
	</item>

<!-- NOTE: The following two elements are distinct papers, which will eventually be treated as separate entities when the Exhibit interface is set up. Please don't delete them yet. -Mike
<item>
	<title>Friends and foes: Ideological social networking</title>
	<author>Michael J. Brzozowski, Tad Hogg, and Gabor Szabo</author>
	<date>2008-01-12 0:00:00</date>
	<description>Traditional online social network sites use a single monolithic "friends" relationship to link users. However, users  may even more in common with strangers, suggesting the use of a "similarity network" to recommend content. This paper examines the usefulness of this distinction in propagating new content. Using both macroscopic and microscopic social dynamics, we present an analysis of Essembly, an ideological social network that semantically distinguishes between friends and ideological allies and nemeses. Although users have greater similarity with their allies than their friends and nemeses, surprisingly, the allies network does not affect voting behavior, despite being as large as the friends network. In contrast, users are influenced differently by their friends and nemeses, indicating that people use these networks for distinct purposes. We suggest resulting design implications for social content aggregation services and recommender systems.
	
	To appear at CHI 2008. Florence, Italy. April 5-10, 2008.</description>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/essembly/#chi</link>
	<minidescription>Examines the usefulness of distinguishing between friends and similar/dissimilar users in propagating new content in an online social network, and suggests resulting design implications for social content aggregation services and recommender systems.</minidescription>
</item>



<item>
	<title>Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks</title>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/essembly/#sip</link>
	<author>Tad Hogg, Dennis M. Wilkinson, Gabor Szabo, and Michael J. Brzozowski</author>
	<date>2008-01-10 18:09:00</date>
	<minidescription>The effects of multiple types of relationship on spreading content across a social network, and analysis of network properties of an ideological social networking site.</minidescription>
	<description>Online social networking is increasingly popular and is a feature of many websites. Providing multiple types of relationship, such as friend, fan or colleague, can enhance the significance of the networks. We present an empirical study of an online political forum where users engage in content creation, voting, and discussion. The users also make explicit connections via three relationship types, forming three distinct networks. We establish a strong correlation between network participation and site activity and show that users stayed faithful to the relationship semantics, in aggregate. Moreover, we demonstrate significant structural differences among the networks, indicating different uses for each. Social networking features may help spread the word about new content, but we show that the networks played a surprisingly moderate role in this respect. Usage and social networking patterns were typical of many web communities, suggesting that multiple relationship types could be successfully featured in other such communities
	To appear in AAAI Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing. Stanford, CA, USA. March 26-28, 2008.
	</description>
</item>
-->

<item>
	<title>A Statistical Approach to Risk Mitigation in Computational Markets</title>
        <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Thomas_Sandholm/sandholm2007a.pdf</link>
        <minidescription>Applying Occam's razor to statistics to enable risk preference multiplexing.</minidescription>
        <description>We study stochastic models to mitigate the risk of poor Quality-of-Service (QoS) in computational markets.  Consumers who purchase services expect both price and performance guarantees. They need to predict future demand to budget for sustained performance despite price fluctuations.  Conversely, providers need to estimate demand to price future usage.  The skewed and bursty nature of demand in large-scale computer networks challenges the common statistical assumptions of symmetry, independence, and stationarity. This discrepancy leads to underestimation of investment risk. We confirm this non-normal distribution behavior in our study of demand in computational markets.</description>
	<author>Thomas Sandholm and Kevin Lai</author>
	<date>2007-07-12 14:08:00</date>
</item>
</channel></rss>