<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="results.xsl" ?><root>
<item>
 <title>Feedback loops of attention in peer production</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/feedbacks/feedbacks.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>Why does the distribution of user contributions obey a power law?</minidescription>
 <description>A significant percentage of online content is now
published and consumed via the mechanism of crowdsourcing.
While any user can contribute to these forums, a disproportionately
large percentage of the content is submitted by very active
and devoted users, whose continuing participation is key to the
sites’ success. As we show, people’s propensity to keep participating
increases the more they contribute, suggesting motivating
factors which increase over time. This paper demonstrates that
submitters who stop receiving attention tend to stop contributing,
while prolific contributors attract an ever increasing number of
followers and their attention in a feedback loop. We demonstrate
that this mechanism leads to the observed power law in the
number of contributions per user and support our assertions
by an analysis of hundreds of millions of contributions to top
content sharing websites Digg.com and Youtube.com.</description>
 <author>Fang Wu, Dennis M. Wilkinson and Bernardo Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>2009-05-04 23:13:00</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>crowdsourcing</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
 <title>A Persistence Paradox</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/persistence/persistence.pdf</link>
 <minidescription>How persistence does not lead to success</minidescription>
 <description>A hallmark of the attention economy is the competition for the attention of others in information rich environments. Thus people persistently upload content to social media sites, hoping for the highly unlikely outcome of topping the charts and reaching a wide audience. And yet, an analysis of the production histories and success dynamics of 10 million videos from Youtube revealed that the more frequently an individual uploads content the less likely it is that it will reach a success threshold. This paradoxical result is further compounded by the fact that the average quality of submissions does increase with the number of uploads, and also that the likelihood success is less than that of playing a lottery.</description>
 <author>Fang Wu and Bernardo Huberman</author>
 <pubDate>2009-03-21 00:33:00</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>persistence</tag>
  <tag>success</tag>
  <tag>social computing</tag>
  <tag>lotteries</tag>
  <tag>youtube</tag>
 </tags>
</item>


<item>
 <title>Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/feedback</link>
 <minidescription>Attention matters in motivating contributions to enterprise social media. But some types of attention matter more.</minidescription>
 <description>Increasingly, large organizations are experimenting with internal social media (e.g., blogs, forums) as a platform for widespread distributed collaboration. Contributions to their counterparts outside the organization's firewall are driven by attention from strangers, in addition to sharing among friends. However, employees in a workplace under time pressures may be reluctant to participate and the audience for their contributions is comparatively smaller. Participation rates also vary widely from group to group. So what influences people to contribute in this environment?

In this paper, we present the results of a year-long empirical study of internal social media participation at a large technology company, and analyze the impact attention, feedback, and managers and coworkers participation have on employees behavior. We find feedback in the form of posted comments is highly correlated with a users subsequent participation. Recent manager and coworker activity relate to users initiating or resuming participation in social media. These findings extend, to an aggregate level, the results from prior interviews about blogging at the company and offer design and policy implications for organizations seeking to encourage social media adoption.

To appear at GROUP 2009.</description>
 <author>Michael J. Brzozowski, Thomas Sandholm, and Tad Hogg</author>
 <pubDate>2009-03-18 00:00:00</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>blogs</tag>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>hp</tag>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>participation</tag>
  <tag>GROUP</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
 <title>WaterCooler: Exploring an organization through enterprise social media</title>
 <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/watercooler/group2009</link>
 <minidescription>Cross-referencing enterprise social media with an enterprise directory can increase inter-group communication.</minidescription>
 <description>As organizations scale up, their collective knowledge increases, and the potential for serendipitous collaboration between members grows dramatically. However, finding people with the right expertise or interests becomes much more difficult. Semi-structured social media, such as blogs, forums, and bookmarking, present a viable platform for collaboration--if enough people participate, and if shared content is easily findable. Within the trusted confines of an organization, users can trade anonymity for a rich identity that carries information about their role, location, and position in its hierarchy.

This paper describes WaterCooler, a tool that aggregates shared internal social media and cross-references it with an organization's directory. We deployed WaterCooler in a large global enterprise and present the results of a preliminary user study. Despite the lack of complete social networking affordances, we find that WaterCooler changed users' perceptions of their workplace, made them feel more connected to each other and the company, and redistributed users' attention outside their own business groups.

To appear at GROUP 2009.</description>
 <author>Michael J. Brzozowski</author>
 <pubDate>2009-03-17 00:00:00</pubDate>
 <tags>
  <tag>blogs</tag>
  <tag>social media</tag>
  <tag>hp</tag>
  <tag>watercooler</tag>
  <tag>attention</tag>
  <tag>GROUP</tag>
 </tags>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy</title>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/blogging/chi2009</link>
	<minidescription>How do you get people to blog at work?</minidescription>
	<tags>
		<tag>blogs</tag>
		<tag>attention</tag>
		<tag>social media</tag>
		<tag>participation</tag>
		<tag>CHI</tag>
	</tags>
	<description>
		The attention economy motivates participation in peer-produced sites on the Web like YouTube and Wikipedia. However, this economy appears to break down at work. We studied a large internal corporate blogging community using log files and interviews and found that employees expected to receive attention when they contributed to blogs, but these expectations often went unmet. Like in the external blogosphere, a few people received most of the attention, and many people received little or none. Employees expressed frustration if they invested time and received little or no perceived return on investment. While many corporations are looking to adopt Web-based communication tools like blogs, wikis, and forums, these efforts will fail unless employees are motivated to participate and contribute content. We identify where the attention economy breaks down in a corporate blog community and suggest mechanisms for improvement.
		To appear at CHI 2009.
	</description>
	<author>Sarita Yardi, Scott A. Golder, and Michael J. Brzozowski</author>
	<pubDate>2009-01-20 16:33:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/twitter</link>
  <minidescription>the social network that matters is not the one you declare.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>attention</tag>
	<tag>twitter</tag>
	<tag>social networks</tag>
	<tag>social media</tag>
	<tag>First Monday</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
Scholars, advertisers and political activists see massive online social
networks as a representation of social interactions that can be used
to study the propagation of ideas, social bond dynamics and viral marketing,
among others. But the linked structures of social networks do
not reveal actual interactions among people. Scarcity of attention and
the daily rhythms of life and work makes people default to interacting
with those few that matter and that reciprocate their attention. A
study of social interactions within Twitter reveals that the driver of
usage is a sparse and hidden network of connections underlying the
declared set of friends and followers.


</description>
  <author>Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero and Fang Wu</author>
  <pubDate>2008-12-05 15:27:00</pubDate>
</item>


<item>
  <title>Predicting the popularity of online content</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/predictions</link>
  <minidescription>popularity, youtube, digg, attention, predicting future downloads.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>attention</tag>
	<tag>youtube</tag>
	<tag>popularity</tag>
	<tag>social media</tag>
	<tag>prediction</tag>
	<tag>online content</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
We present a method for accurately predicting the long time
popularity of online content from early measurements of
user access. Using two content sharing portals, Youtube
and Digg, we show that by modeling the accrual of views
and votes on content offered by these services we can
predict the long-term dynamics of individual submissions from
initial data. In the case of Digg, measuring access to given
stories during the first two hours allows us to forecast their
popularity 30 days ahead with remarkable accuracy, while
downloads of Youtube videos need to be followed for 10 days
to attain the same performance. The differing time scales
of the predictions are shown to be due to differences in how
content is consumed on the two portals: Digg stories quickly
become outdated, while Youtube videos are still found long
after they are initially submitted to the portal. We show
that predictions are more accurate for submissions for which
attention decays quickly, whereas predictions for evergreen
content will be prone to larger errors.


</description>
  <author>Gabor Szabo and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
  <pubDate>2008-11-03 15:27:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Revealing the long tail in office conversations</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/watercooler</link>
  <minidescription>Visibility, attention, and recognition drive participation in internal corporate social media.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	<tag>watercooler</tag>
	<tag>blogs</tag>
	<tag>attention</tag>
	<tag>social media</tag>
	<tag>hp</tag>
	<tag>CSCW</tag>
  </tags>
  <description>
Blogs, wikis, and forums can break down geographic distances, workgroup boundaries, and organizational
hierarchy in an organization. While these tools significantly lower the barriers to producing content, employees may
perceive there to be little incentive to invest their own time in providing this content for public consumption. We found
that increasing visibility often motivated employees to participate and contribute content. Employees were
motivated by the opportunity for attention, and the ways in which social media tools enabled or hindered this
opportunity influenced the way it was used. In this paper, we describe the design and use of the internal social media
platforms at Hewlett-Packard and examine the ways that employees used these tools. Specifically, we explore ways
in which designing for increased visibility and providing opportunities for recognition improve the ways that social
media platforms can be used in organizations.

To appear at CSCW 2008 Workshop on Enterprise 3.0.
</description>
  <author>Michael J. Brzozowski and Sarita Yardi</author>
  <pubDate>2008-10-13 15:27:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Crowdsourcing, Attention and Productivity</title>
  <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/crowd/crowd.pdf</link>
  <minidescription>How to solve the digital commons dilemma.</minidescription>
  <tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>reputation</tag>
	<tag>crowdsourcing</tag>

  </tags> 
  <description>The tragedy of the digital commons does not seem to prevent the
copious voluntary production of content that one witnesses in the web.
We show through an analysis of a massive data set from Youtube that
the productivity exhibited in crowdsourcing exhibits a strong positive
dependence on attention, measured by the number of downloads.
Conversely, a lack of attention leads to a decrease in the number of
videos uploaded and the consequent drop in productivity, which in
many cases asymptotes to no uploads whatsoever. Moreover, we observed
that uploaders compare themselves to others when having low
productivity and to themselves when exceeding a personal threshold.
	</description>
	<author>Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero and Fang Wu</author>
  <pubDate>2008-09-11 12:00:00</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
        <title>Strong regularities in online peer production</title>
        <author>Dennis M. Wilkinson</author>
        <pubDate>2008-04-10 00:00:00</pubDate>
<tags>
	  <tag>social networks</tag>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
	  <tag>opinion formation</tag>
  </tags> 
        <description>Online peer production systems have enabled people to 
coactively create, share, classify, and rate content on an unprecedented scale.
This paper describes strong macroscopic regularities in how people
contribute to peer production systems, and shows how these regularities
arise from simple dynamical rules. First, it is demonstrated
that the probability a person stops contributing varies inversely with
the number of contributions he has made. This rule leads to a power
law distribution for the number of contributions per person in which
a small number of very active users make most of the contributions.
The rule also implies that the power law exponent is proportional to
the effort required to contribute, as justified by the data. Second, the
level of activity per topic is shown to follow a lognormal distribution
generated by a stochastic reinfo cement mechanism. A small
number of very popular topics thus accumulate the vast majority of
contributions. These trends are demonstrated to hold across hundreds
of millions of contributions to four disparate peer production
systems of differing scope, interface style, and purpose.</description>
        <minidescription>Simple behavioral rules hold across hundreds of millions of contributions to disparate online peer production efforts.</minidescription> 
        <link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/regularities/</link>
</item>


<item>
	<title>Popularity, novelty and attention</title>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
	<pubDate>2008-01-24 0:00:00</pubDate>
	<description>We analyze the role that popularity and novelty play in attracting
the attention of users to dynamic websites. We do so by determining
the performance of three different strategies that can be utilized to
maximize attention. The first one prioritizes novelty while the second
emphasizes popularity. A third strategy looks myopically into
the future and prioritizes stories that are expected to generate the
most clicks within the next few minutes. We show that the first two
strategies should be selected on the basis of the rate of novelty decay,
while the third strategy performs sub-optimally in most cases. We also
demonstrate that the relative performance of the first two strategies
as a function of the rate of novelty decay changes abruptly around a
critical value, resembling a phase transition in the physical world.
	
	</description>
	<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/popularity/popularity.pdf</link>
	<minidescription>Whether to use popularity or novelty to elicit attention</minidescription>
        <tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
        </tags> 
</item>
<item>
<title>Novelty and Collective Attention</title>


<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/novelty/index.html</link>
<minidescription>How does novelty affect the attention of large groups</minidescription>
<description>The subject of collective attention is central to an information age where millions of people are inundated with daily messages. It is thus of interest to understand how attention to novel items propagates and eventually fades among large populations. We have analyzed the dynamics of collective attention among one million users of an interactive website -digg.com- devoted to thousands of novel news stories. The observations can be described by a dynamical model characterized by a single novelty factor. Our measurements indicate that novelty within groups decays with a stretched-exponential law, suggesting the existence of a natural time scale over which attention fades within large groups.
	</description>
	<author>Fang Wu and Bernardo A. Huberman</author>
	<pubDate>2007-03-26 10:00:00</pubDate>
<tags>
	  <tag>attention</tag>
        </tags> 
</item>

<item>
<title>The Economics of Attention: Maximizing User Value in Information-Rich Environments</title>
<link>http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/attention/index.html</link>
	<minidescription>Deciding what to display.</minidescription>
<description>
 We introduce an automatic configuration mechanism that generates the most relevant information to be presented to limited attention users of information-rich media. It also guarantees to maximize their total expected utility from the information they receive. A computationally efficient algorithm is used to assign an index value to each information item, which then determines whether or not a given item appears in the top list presented to users at a given time.
</description>
<author>Bernardo A. Huberman and Fang Wu</author>
<pubDate>2007-01-26 01:47:00</pubDate>
<tags>
	<tag>attention</tag>
        </tags> 
</item>
</root>