[Gc] [PATCH] new_gc_alloc.h
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:58:56 -0800
On Nov 13, 2003, at 2:50 PM, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> Is there a reason not to use gc_allocator.h instead? It should be
> more portable,
> and it's a bit more careful about this sort of stuff.
No real reason I guess other than legacy. gc_allocator.h wasn't written
yet when we started using the GC. We've just made the necessary changes
to new_gc_alloc.h to update it for new gcc releases. It even works on
MSVC. Portable enough for me.