[Gc] Difference between version 6.3 and latest which is 6.4

Hans Boehm Hans.Boehm at hp.com
Wed Jun 22 09:26:40 PDT 2005

It's a configurable option.  But I think it's on by default in my source
distributions.  I didn't check other distributions.


On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 mental at rydia.net wrote:

> Quoting "Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at hp.com>:
> > If you're sure it contains no pointers, I would probably use
> > GC_malloc_atomic_uncollectable, though the system malloc is
> > not a bad choice either.
> Isn't GC_malloc_atomic_uncollectable only available in special
> builds of libgc?
> -mental

More information about the Gc mailing list