hans.boehm at hp.com
Thu Mar 24 10:59:10 PST 2005
It sounds like the current patch is fine.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gc-bounces at napali.hpl.hp.com
> [mailto:gc-bounces at napali.hpl.hp.com] On Behalf Of Juan Jose
> Garcia Ripoll
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:29 AM
> To: gc at napali.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: Re: [Gc] NetBSD/Sparc
> Boehm, Hans wrote:
> >I have a different patch in my tree that uses
> machine/frame.h instead
> >of sparc/frame.h on NETBSD. Do those point to the same
> place? If so,
> >I'll use the current patch, since it seems marginally cleaner and
> >shorter (FREEBSD and NETBSD are the same). If not, let me know, and
> >I'll use this patch.
> According to the user who submitted the patch to the ECL
> mailing list...
> [...]on sparc64 (which is my machine) machine/frame.h
> includes sparc/frame.h, and on sparc (32bit that is)
> machine/frame.h is exactly sparc/frame.h itself.
> If it matters, I'm running NetBSD 2.0.
> Jachym Holecek (whom can be contacted at freza at psi.cz) would
> gladly do further testing of the garbage collector on this
> platform, if required.
> Gc mailing list
> Gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
More information about the Gc