[Gc] Problem with finalizers
scholz at scriptolutions.com
Wed May 2 18:08:40 PDT 2007
Thursday, May 3, 2007, 6:26:15 AM, you wrote:
BH> Return-Path: <bruce.hoult at gmail.com>
BH> X-Original-To: scholz at scriptolutions.com
BH> Delivered-To: v03441615 at dd2300.kasserver.com
BH> Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [188.8.131.52])
BH> by dd2300.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A081142D9
BH> for <scholz at scriptolutions.com>; Thu, 3 May 2007 01:26:18 +0200 (CEST)
BH> Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so316545wra
BH> for <scholz at scriptolutions.com>; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
BH> DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
BH> d=gmail.com; s=beta;
BH> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
BH> d=gmail.com; s=beta;
BH> Received: by 10.115.19.16 with SMTP id w16mr441929wai.1178148375546;
BH> Wed, 02 May 2007 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
BH> Received: by 10.114.159.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
BH> <391c06200705021626qf70f342lf9798f9978d218be at mail.gmail.com>
BH> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:26:15 +1200
BH> From: "Bruce Hoult" <bruce at hoult.org>
BH> Sender: bruce.hoult at gmail.com
BH> To: "Lothar Scholz" <scholz at scriptolutions.com>
BH> Subject: Re: [Gc] Problem with finalizers
BH> Cc: gc at napali.hpl.hp.com
BH> In-Reply-To: <747585064.20070503061537 at scriptolutions.com>
BH> MIME-Version: 1.0
BH> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
BH> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BH> Content-Disposition: inline
BH> References: <747585064.20070503061537 at scriptolutions.com>
BH> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6324ee2373be0930
BH> On 5/3/07, Lothar Scholz <scholz at scriptolutions.com> wrote:
>> i have written a test program that works fine. It just allocates 400
>> objectes in a loop 200 of them having finalizers. This loop is
>> repeated many times. No references to create objects are held after
>> the loop.
>> Now the strange behaviour:
>> Without finalizers its fast, but with finalizers the whole app stops
>> many times in the gc (as i guess) for seconds. Instead of 200 ms it
>> takes about 22 sec to finish. The finalizer function is empty and
>> there is no CPU load during the stops.
BH> I've got $100 says you're swapping.
Good advise for you: Be more carefull with your money :-)
The program just takes 5 MB on a 2 GB (Core2Duo) system. CPU usage is
below 5% with a peak at 9%.
I wouldn't be surprised if somethings happen or the whole thing
deadlocks. But it just stops for a few seconds and then continues.
And it's just the one i uncomment the
line it all works fine.
BH> It takes memory to record the fact than an object has a finalizer.
BH> Having a finalizer prevents objects from being collected in the first
BH> GC after they become unreferenced, and they have to stay until the 2nd
Maybe Hans can tell me if it is okay to call GC_free from inside the
finalizer to tell the GC that it is not referenced again.
I also tried it with 'GC_finalize_on_demand' set to 0 and 1. No
difference in behaviour.
Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz at scriptolutions.com
More information about the Gc