[Gc] 6.7 or later
hans.boehm at hp.com
Mon Oct 27 09:33:44 PST 2008
I updated gc.tar.gz to be a copy of 6.8. There are some known bugs in 7.1 that were not in 6.8. But for Windows, or if you run into problems, I would definitely go with 7.1 or later. I'll try to get another tar file out with a recent snapshot.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gc-bounces at napali.hpl.hp.com
> [mailto:gc-bounces at napali.hpl.hp.com] On Behalf Of Henning Makholm
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 5:33 AM
> To: gc at napali.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: [Gc] 6.7 or later
> Ivan Maidanski writes:
> > > this gets gctest going.
> > Your are using too outdated version of GC - use either gc7.1 or,
> > better, gc7.2a1 (from CVS).
> However, 6.7 is still the version one gets by following the
> instructions on the website:
> | Typically several versions will be available. Usually you
> should first
> | try to use gc_source/gc.tar.gz, which is normally an older, more
> | stable version.
> If Hans is reading this, I really think it is time to bump
> this default version to something newer. We're using 6.7 for
> production at Octoshape, but recently I've spent so much time
> rediscovering bugs that turned out to be fixed in later
> versions, and backporting the fixes, that I don't think the
> advice to use 6.7 first is a good one.
> Guidelines as to what would be the "safest" later version to
> upgrade to would be appreciated.
> Henning Makholm
> Octoshape ApS
> Gc mailing list
> Gc at linux.hpl.hp.com
More information about the Gc