Re: [Gc] Merge with gcc?
ivmai at mail.ru
Thu Aug 13 07:25:53 PDT 2009
Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> > Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> >>> Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> Is this a good time to merge the gc into gcc downstream? People are
> >>>> asking for Win64 support.
> > Could you explain (at least to me) the meaning of "merge the gc into gcc downstream"?
> The version of gc in gcc is old; I want to update it from the current
> gc tree.
You can't update gcc/boehm-gc without fixing, at least, gcj boehm.cc (because GC API has changed and because gcc/boehm-gc has some private extensions over the gc it had been forked from (v6.6)).
You doubt this is a good time to start working on boehm.cc changes. What are the reasons?
More information about the Gc