Re: [Gc] test.c patch

Ivan Maidanski ivmai at
Wed Dec 9 23:21:54 PST 2009

"Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at> wrote:
> Unless someone can think of a reason not to, I'll shortly check in the attached patch:
> 	* test.c (main, WinMain): Consistently don't invoke GC_enable_incremental
> 	if MAKE_BACK_GRAPH is defined, but do invoke it with parallel marking.
> This should remove some of the unexpected platform differences in heap size..
> Hans
> ATTACHMENT: application/octet-stream (test.c.diff)

1. I don't mind.
2. I think NO_INCREMENTAL should be removed completely because the macro means something like "build the collector with the incremental support but skip testing it (because it's probably broken)".


More information about the Gc mailing list