Re[2]: [Gc] Patches resubmission

Ivan Maidanski ivmai at
Fri Jun 5 00:19:05 PDT 2009


"Boehm, Hans" <hans.boehm at> wrote:
> Thank you.  Committed.
> I'm not sure about the %p in WARN calls, since the corresponding argument is not a pointer anymore at
> that point.  That may eventually start generating warnings?  I checked in the whole patch, but I'm not sure those few bits were an improvement.

Not clear. Is "start" no longer a pointer in your copy of gc for this fragment:
              "GC_gww_read_dirty unexpectedly failed at %p: "
              "Falling back to marking all pages dirty\n", start);

> Hans 


More information about the Gc mailing list