Re[2]: [Gc] Win64 GCC support

Ivan Maidanski ivmai at
Mon Jun 22 07:45:04 PDT 2009


NightStrike <nightstrike at> wrote:
> ...
> Petter Urkedal <urkedal at> wrote:
> > The policy question is rather whether to use AC_DEFINE or to place the
> > macro definition directly into header files under an
> > architecture-dependent conditional.
> Can you guys agree to the bikeshed's color quickly?  Any way will
> work, and will be forwards-maintainable.  Who's the guy that has to
> rubber stamp this?
> I'm not trying to sound impatient.  It's just that this is backing up
> a lot of changes in other projects.  We still need to get all of
> upstream boehm merged down into the GCC tree.  I provided a two-line
> fix that will work with any recent autoconf (you won't be able to use
> 2.53 anymore, but then again, I doubt you can do that anyway what with
> your AC_INIT line and many other macros).  That's one solution, and
> there are several more.  I personally don't care how it's done, I just
> need it done.

Could you submit us a patch (fixing your problems in any way you like) which doesn't touch .c/h files?


More information about the Gc mailing list