[Gc] libatomic_ops: time to alpha release?

Boehm, Hans hans.boehm at hp.com
Thu Oct 15 10:57:16 PDT 2009

> From: Petter Urkedal
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:38 AM
> To: gc at napali.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: Re: [Gc] libatomic_ops: time to alpha release?
> On 2009-10-15, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> > > From:  Petter Urkedal
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 9:39 AM
> > > 
> > > I don't think we need to commit the files under m4 to the repo, 
> > > since they are not used by configure.  The only benefit I 
> can see of 
> > > committing them is for someone who has all Autotools 
> except Libtool.
> > > So, to minimise the number of generated files in the repo, my 
> > > suggestion is to cvsignore them instead.
> > 
> > It sounds like I misunderstood something here.  These files 
> are used only by autoconf to generate configure?  They are 
> not needed by libtool itself in order to drive the 
> compilation?  If so, I agree that it seems better not to 
> check them in, though I think we do need the empty directory 
> in the repository and the tar-ball?  Otherwise the 
> reconfiguration process seemed to fail.
> That's right.  The contents of the required m4 files, 
> including acinclude.m4, gets copied into aclocal.m4, except 
> it seems than those which reside in the m4 dir may be 
> included.  I hadn't notice the includes before.  Then 
> Autoconf uses aclocal.m4 when to instantiate the macros from 
> configure.ac into configure.  On the other hand, the 
> build-aux files (compile, config.sub, config.guess, ...) are required.
> Note also that when leaving out the other m4 files, it does 
> not make sense to keep aclocal.m4 in the repository either 
> due to the includes.
> _______________________________________________

That sounds like a plan.

I don't see the warning that Ivan complained about either, so I suspect that with these changes, and the libatomic_ops version changes, we should be largely OK.


More information about the Gc mailing list