[Gc] Performance evaluation

Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr
Mon Aug 9 07:04:41 PDT 2010

I have ran bigloo3.2b against bigloo3.4b compiled with two versions of
the GC (7.1 and 7.2alpha4). Here are the results:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: report.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 51248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://napali.hpl.hp.com/pipermail/gc/attachments/20100809/34f7c671/report-0001.pdf
-------------- next part --------------

(sorry for the poor presentation of the results).

As one can see, bigloo-3.4b and bigloo-3.2b behave similarly provided
the version of the collector is 7.1. It also looks like gc7.2 incurs a
significant performance penalty. Thus, for those interest in high
performance, I suggest configuring Bigloo with the option



More information about the Gc mailing list